If one party wants to negotiate on a mandatory issue, it is an unfair labour practice if the other party refuses. Other matters are permissive subjects of negotiation, and it may be an unfair labor practice for a party to demand negotiations on them (NLRB v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, 78 pp. Ct. 718, 2 L. Ed. 2d 823 [1958]). Thus, although the parties must negotiate at an impasse on mandatory subjects of negotiation before making unilateral changes, they can unilaterally change permissive issues without negotiations and cannot be forced to negotiate such changes.
Collective bargaining refers to the process of bargaining between an employer and a union of employees to reach an agreement that regulates the terms and conditions of employment of employees. One area of the current dispute between unions and employers is whether wage increases are mandatory bargaining grounds. In Acme Die Casting v. NLRB, 26 F.3d 162 (D.C. Cir. 1994), the Court of Appeal analyzed the employer`s historical practice of determining the frequency and extent of wage increases and concluded that the granting of a wage increase was not at the discretion of the employer and could not be decided without negotiations with the union (see also Daily News of Los Angeles v. NLRB, 979 F.2d 1571 [D.C. Cir. 1992] [Reference to the NLRB to determine whether salary increases in terms of timing but discretion in terms of amount are considered mandatory subjects of negotiation]).
Not all workers in the industrial sector have the right to collective bargaining. State laws continue to regulate collective bargaining and make collective agreements enforceable under state law. They can also provide guidelines for employers and employees who are not covered by the NLRA, such as agricultural workers. Collective bargaining is when a group of workers, supported by their unions, negotiates their employment contracts with their employer under conditions.4 min read In Fibreboard, the Supreme Court ruled that, according to its three-part analysis, an employer`s decision to outsource part of its business activity is a subject of mandatory negotiation. First, subcontracting falls within the literal meaning of the NLRA as „working conditions“. Second, the conclusion that subcontracting is a matter of compulsory bargaining achieves the objectives of the NLRA by „bringing a problem of vital importance to work and management within the framework established by Congress as the most conducive to industrial peace“ – namely collective bargaining. Third, other employers in the same industry have engaged in the contract negotiation process rather than leaving it to management`s discretion. Justice Potter Stewart added in his approval that issues that „are at the heart of the control of the company,“ such as decisions on „the commitment of private equity and the fundamental scope of the business,“ are not mandatory subjects of negotiation. Mandatory bargaining matters Although the parties do not have to negotiate on every conceivable matter, they must negotiate in good faith on mandatory bargaining matters, which include wages, hours of work, and other „working conditions“ (29 U.S.C.A. § 158(d)).
Because these mandatory issues are very broad, the courts have tried over the years to set standards for determining whether a particular subject of negotiation is mandatory. In general, terms and conditions of employment include only those matters that „govern an aspect of the employer-employee relationship“ (Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 404 U.S. 157, 92 pp. Ct. 383, 30 L. Ed. 2d 341 [1971]).
The NLRA establishes procedures for the selection of a work organization that represents a unit of workers in collective bargaining. Employers are prohibited by law from interfering in this selection. The NLRA requires the employer to negotiate with the designated representative of its employees. It does not require either party to accept a proposal or make concessions, but establishes procedural guidelines for good faith negotiations. Proposals that violate the NLRA or other laws may not be subject to collective bargaining. The NLRA also establishes rules on tactics (e.g., strikes, lockouts, picket lines) that each party can use to achieve its bargaining objectives. While most decisions made by an employer affect employees, not all are mandatory bargaining matters. Some decisions, such as advertising and product selection, are so indirectly related to the employment relationship and have so little impact on the employment relationship that they are almost certainly only permissive subjects of negotiation. Other decisions, such as those relating to recruitment, dismissals and company rules, are so directly relevant to the employment relationship that they are almost certainly mandatory subjects of negotiation.
Still other decisions do not address the employment relationship, but have a significant impact on it and are therefore difficult to characterize as permissive or mandatory subjects of negotiation (First National Maintenance Corp. v. NLRB, 452 U.S. 666, 101 pp. Ct. 2573, 69 L. Ed. 2d 318 [1981] [relying on Fibreboard Paper Products v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 85 pp. Ct. 398, 13 L.
Ed. 2d 233 (1964) [Stewart, J., approval]). The Supreme Court has made several attempts to define the scope of mandatory negotiations for this third category of management decisions. The ACLU continues to support the right of public and private workers to organize unions and engage in collective bargaining. Collective bargaining laws provide essential and necessary protection for workers exercising fundamental civil rights, in particular the right to speak, to speak, to speak and to petition. Efforts to deprive workers of this protection have no place in our democracy. In Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. __ (2014), caregivers who care for participants with disabilities at home (as part of a state-created program) decided to unionize. The collective agreement between the union and the state contained a provision on a „fair share“. Like an agency provision, this required „a proportionate share of the costs of the collective bargaining process and the administration of contracts of all personal assistants who are not members of a union.“ Workers who had spoken out against it complained, saying the provision violated their freedom of expression and association. There are three different categories of subjects that are part of an ABA: mandatory, voluntary or permissive and illegal subjects.
For more information on collective bargaining, check out this Florida State Law Review article, this Nova Southeastern University Law Review article, and this Boston College Law Review article. When negotiations take place in an industry such as hospitality or freight forwarding, industry-wide or regional negotiations are sometimes required. For example, the collective agreement may affect employers who are located in a particular city or in an entire industry. One area of the current dispute between unions and employers is whether wage increases are mandatory bargaining grounds. In Acme Die Casting v. NLRB, 26 F.3d 162 (D.C. Cir. 1994), the Court of Appeal analyzed the employer`s historical practice of determining the frequency and extent of wage increases and concluded that the granting of a wage increase was not at the discretion of the employer and could not be decided without negotiations with the union. In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court did not resolve whether wage increases were mandatory collective bargaining issues, so federal courts of appeal developed their own rules to address this issue.
If an employer does not exercise its discretion to determine the timing or amount of a wage increase, the issuance of wage increases is a mandatory subject of collective bargaining. NLRB v. Beverly Enter.-Mass., Inc., 174 F.3d 13 (1. Cir. 1999). Even if an employer exercises some discretion in determining the wage increase, such as an annual increase to cover the cost of living, this fact does not prevent the wage increase from becoming a mandatory matter if the company has a long-standing practice of granting such wage increases. NLRB v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., No. 00-1969, 2001 WL 791645 (4, 13 July 2001). Public sector workers may be deprived of the participation of their State Governments in collective bargaining; The collective bargaining rights of private sector workers are in the hands of Congress. Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (29 U.S.C.A.
§§ 151 et seq.) in 1935 to establish workers` right to collective bargaining and other group activities (Section 157). The NLRA also established the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB), a federal body empowered to uphold the right to collective bargaining (Article 153).
Komentari su zatvoreni.