As a general rule, section 205(a)(1) of the Investment Advisers Act 1940 (the Advisers Act) prohibits an advisor registered with the SEC from charging clients performance commissions. However, the Advisory Act and its rules provide for certain exceptions to this restriction. Rule 205-3(a) allows an investment advisor to collect a return commission, such as interest bearing, from „eligible clients“ defined in such a rule. In 2012, the SEC amended the definition of „qualified client“ to include, among other things, one of the following: (i) a person or firm that has at least $1 million under the direction of the investment advisor under a contract with the Fund, (ii) a person or entity that the Manager reasonably believes to be immediately after entering into the contract with the Fund, has a net worth of more than $2 million (with a spouse if it is an individual), without the value of the person`s principal residence and debts, or (iii) a person or business that the advisor reasonably believes to be an eligible buyer (see above). A full definition of „qualified customer“ can be found here. Knowledgeable employees of a private fund are only considered RNs when it comes to investments in that private fund. This change allows employees to invest in their private funds without the fund itself losing AI status (based on Rule 501(a)(8), which targets shareholders of a company that otherwise does not qualify as an AI if it has assets of $5 million or less). For joint investments made by a knowledgeable employee and their spouse in a private fund, the amended rules assign the AI status of the knowledgeable employee to their spouse. Two other SEC commissioners (Roisman and Hester) have generally supported the changes as a way to expand access to private investment opportunities beyond the wealthiest members of the public to those with sufficient financial literacy.
Both Commissioners were in favour of expanding the definition of AI to include knowledge-based eligibility (e.g., SEC experts based on their knowledge of securities laws) (Roisman) and other financially demanding individuals who may not have the proven certifications or qualifications required by the revised rules, but who still have „the experience, local knowledge, education and investment acumen to build a balanced investment portfolio, maximize the emergency funds they pass on to their children, or to their own communities to invest. „(Hester) The SEC has refused to include other certifications, designations or professional qualifications such as other exams will end in the original order, as this allows it to first test the new rules with a limited and carefully selected number of certifications and references. However, as mentioned in the introductory notice, other qualifications, designations and qualifying professional qualifications may be established by the SEC in the future on the basis of a non-exclusive list of specified attributes. [3] Under the final rules, natural persons are not allowed to certify that they have the financial sophistication to be qualified investors. The Securities and Exchange Commission has passed amendments to update and improve the definition of „qualified investor“ in the Commission`s regulations and the definition of „qualified institutional purchaser“ in Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The amendments to the definition of qualified investors add new categories of natural persons and qualified entities and make certain other changes to the existing definition. The amendments to the definition of qualified institutional purchaser similarly expand the list of eligible businesses under this definition. The SEC refused to change the definition of AI to include qualified buyers („QPs“) because most QPs already meet the definition of AI because of the higher financial thresholds that apply to them. In addition, an AI is not necessarily considered a QP or under other regulatory standards set out in the SEC rules, and QP status and these other regulatory standards are not designed to capture the same characteristics as the AI standard. The amendments to the definition of qualified institutional purchaser (ii) are not specifically formed for the acquisition of the interest in the Fund and have total assets of more than $5,000,000. The Commission also adopted amendments in line with Rule 163B of the Securities Act and Rule 15g-1 of the Foreign Exchange Act. „§230.501 Definitions and terms used in Regulation D.“ (accessed August 25, 2021) The „qualified client“ requirement generally excludes (i) family office and venture capital fund advisors, (ii) advisors with assets under management of less than $100 million, and (iii) private fund advisors with assets under management of less than $150 million.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. „Accredited Investors – Updated Investor Bulletin“. Retrieved 25 August 2021. This person`s net worth is exactly $1 million. This includes a calculation of their assets (other than their principal residence) of $1,050,000 ($100,000 + $500,000 + $450,000) less a $50,000 car loan. Because they meet the net asset requirement, they qualify as a qualified investor. Qualified investors also have privileged access to venture capital, hedge funds, angel investments and transactions with complex and riskier investments and instruments. (i) has a net worth (with his or her spouse) that exceeds $1,000,000 (excluding the value of his or her principal residence); or The amendments revise Rule 501(a), Rule 215 and Rule 144A of the Securities Act.
As noted with the proposed amendment, subscription agreements used to offer private fund shares, as well as investor letters and other documents distributed in connection with private placements, tend to fully state the definitions of AI and QIB (often with checkboxes), and these documents, as well as subscriptions, offering notes and securities law legends, generally refer explicitly to: „qualified investors within the meaning of paragraphs (1), (2), (3) or (7) of Rule 501(a)“ if they intend to cover accredited institutional investors, since there is no technical definition of the term „institutionally qualified investor“. Practitioners should consider amending subscription agreements and other documents to reflect changes in the definitions of AI and QIB. Generally, a qualified buyer is an investor who meets one of the following criteria: The introductory version of the SEC (the „Adoptive Version“) (available here) follows the proposed press release issued by the SEC in December 2019, based on a July 2019 concept statement in which the public comments on revisions to the definition of AI as part of increased efforts to simplify, harmonize and improve the framework for exempted persons. Offers were sought. Under the Investment Companies Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), section 3(c) exempts from the definition of investment company many types of companies that would otherwise be subject to the significant regulatory requirements of the 1940 Act. Section 3(c)(1) excludes private investment companies from regulation under the 1940 Act if they meet two requirements: (1) they may not make or intend to make a public offering of their securities, and (2) they may not have more than 100 beneficial owners of their securities. Therefore, an easy way to meet the first requirement would be for the fund to comply with Rule 506 of Regulation D, including by selling only to qualified investors. To meet the second requirement, it must have no more than 100 beneficial owners. Although many private funds meet the definition of „investment company“ under the Investment Companies Act of 1940 because of their investment and securities trading activities, most private funds are exempt from registration as an investment company under the exemptions of the Act under section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7).
Komentari su zatvoreni.