(1) Anyone who commits the offence of simple theft after being convicted of an offence shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of up to ten years. (f) In an indictment for theft of a deed of ownership of immovable, it is sufficient to state that the instrument is or contains proof of title or part of the property of the person or a person of persons having a legal interest, in equity or equity in the immovable property to which it relates. and to mention such immovable property or part of it: the property must be „of someone else“. Wild animals cannot therefore be stolen. The co-owners are also not guilty of theft. Theft is a crime against property. Therefore, it is possible for the person who owns the property to steal the property from a person who had rightful possession of it. For example, states provide that a person repairing a car had a lien on the car to guarantee payment for the work. The lien is a privilege of possession, which means that the repairer has the privilege as long as he retains possession of the car. If the owner of the title were to take the car from the holder of the lien, this action could be sued as theft in some jurisdictions. The fact that the threatened measure may be legal or even morally desirable does not preclude it from being unjustified. For example, a demand for money accompanied by a threat to reveal to the victim`s employer that they stole from the company will almost certainly be blackmail, although most think it is right to inform the employer. It is the use of the threat to make money that usually makes it considered unjustified.
Add the flight to one of your lists below or create a new one. Over time, English courts have recognized the need to broaden the concept of theft. In the absence of legislative action, they created new crimes based on how the theft was carried out. Embezzlement was created in the eighteenth century to punish the embezzlement of property after legal possession. This fee would apply, for example, if a store clerk accepts a customer`s money in a legal sale and then takes that money for their own use. Embezzlement was punished more severely than theft because it was a breach of trust. Most jurisdictions have abandoned the terminology Big/Small and use value to classify theft as a felony or misdemeanor. „Value“ means the market value of the property at the time and place. Most jurisdictions also criminalize certain thefts, regardless of the value of the confiscated property. For example, Section 14 – 72 (b) (1) of the General Laws of North Carolina makes the crime of theft a crime „regardless of its value“ if the theft is committed (1) by the person (2) committed as a result of certain types of burglary or intrusion (3) of an explosive or incendiary device or (4) a firearm. [48] Modern spelling is a minor theft for the level of the offense. [ref.
needed] Some states may also charge for certain types of theft like „theft,“ „burglary,“ „theft,“ „shoplifting,“ „conversion,“ and other terms. services and works as well as intangible movable property (intangible rights)[18] such as contractual rights and actions in action[37], wills, codicils or other testamentary documents; Wildlife [18] and objects of no economic value [38] are not subject to common law robbery. The Theft and Related Crimes Act was passed in the United States and has remained in effect throughout the country`s history. Then, in the twentieth century, many legislators abolished it in favor of a broad theft law. In North Dakota, for example, the crime of theft now includes „theft, theft, expropriation, embezzlement, obtaining money or property under false pretenses, extortion, extortion, fraudulent conversion, obtaining stolen property, embezzlement of public funds, fraud, etc.“ (N.D. Code § 12.1-23-01 [1995]). However, the 1968 Act does not contain a complete definition of „dishonesty“. Limiting the scope of theft to personal property can have practical consequences.
For example, a person can „steal“ a central air conditioner by cutting connections to the house, removing the unit from its concrete slab and dragging the unplugged unit into a truck. In most jurisdictions, a central air conditioner changes from a personal property to a real estate (a device) once connected to a building. In modern times, separating an appliance from the property would convert the fixture from real estate back into personal property. However, the common law states that if the separation and carriage of an aircraft were a continuous act, no theft would take place. The defendant`s actions in this example would therefore only constitute property damage and would not result in possession of stolen property, since no theft took place. However, if the person turned off the air conditioning, left the scene to find someone to help move the device, came back and loaded the device into their truck and left, the crime would be theft. Contrary to popular belief, it is not necessary for the property to be removed from the owner`s premises or removed from his property for completion to be completed. The slightest movement of its original position with the intention of flying is enough. The problem is proof. If a person picks up a packet of steaks to steal it, then changes his mind and puts the steak back in the meat counter, the crime of theft has been committed, but the state will have a hard time proving it. However, if the thief hides the steaks by putting them in the clothes, his intention is quite clear.
Of course, there could always be an innocent, albeit bizarre, explanation. [26] Significant theft is generally defined as the theft of a larger amount of property. In the United States, it is often defined as an amount worth $400 or more. In New York, Grand Larceny refers to amounts of $1,000 or more. Major theft is often classified as a crime with the associated possibility of a harsher penalty. In Virginia, the threshold is only $5 if it is taken by a person, or $500 if it is not taken by the person. [45] Cheque theft is subject to the same penalty as cash or other valuables. [46] Some states (such as North Carolina) use the term „criminal theft“ instead of Grand Larceny.
In the state of New South Wales, the common law offence of theft is punishable by up to 5 years in prison. [3] Although section 117 of the New South Wales Crimes Act (1900) sets out the penalty for theft, it remains silent on the elements of the offence and leaves that to the common law. [3] The leading authority on flying in New South Wales is the Ilich v R case (1987) of the High Court of Australia. [4] In this case, the elements mens rea and actus reus are defined, which must be proven by the prosecution for a conviction to be successful. The common law offence of theft was codified by the Larceny Act of 1916. It was abolished on 1 January 1969[9] for all purposes[8] not relating to offences committed before that date. [10] It was replaced by the broader offence of theft under section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968. This offence contained some of the terminology and substance of theft. English courts have also begun to differentiate based on the value of stolen property. A great theft was any theft of property worth more than a certain amount of money. Any theft of property of less than this amount was called petty theft and punished less severely.
If a theft takes place in circumstances that fall within the definition of burglary due to a legal formality (e.g. technical intrusion – see below), the prosecutor`s office must charge the theft. This gives the court sufficient punitive powers and allows for a clear presentation of the case without additional complications to prove the additional elements required in the burglaries. Historically, property stolen at common law consisted of personal material property. Modern legislation has broadened the scope of criminality by making objects such as crops and furniture related to land and documents proving legal claims larable. Theft requires intrusion; That is, the goods must be removed from someone else`s possession without consent. The extension of theft to the common law has been primarily through the extension of the concept of property belonging to others. Thus, the possession of property entrusted by a master to a servant was considered to remain in the hands of the master; Therefore, a conversion of this property by the servant was theft. Even if, by deception or misrepresentation, a defendant acquires control or possession of property other than that contained therein, possession is deemed not to have been transferred to the offender, and the embezzlement by the offender is theft.
If the owner is induced by a false declaration to consent to the separation of ownership of the property, the offence is the acquisition of property by false pretenses or fraud. In states that have included theft in a general theft law, punishment for theft is largely based on the value of stolen property. In Iowa, for example, stealing property worth more than $10,000, stealing directly from someone else`s person, and stealing property in and around certain abandoned buildings is first-degree theft, a Class C felony.
Komentari su zatvoreni.